home : news : reviews : features : fiction : podcast : blogs : t-shirts : wtf?

Reviewed by Jason Myers, © 2002

Format: Movie
By:   Robert Harmon (Director) and Brendan Hood (Writer)
Genre:   Horror
Released:   November 27, 2002
Review Date:   December 02, 2002
Audience Rating:   PG-13
RevSF Rating:   2/10 (What Is This?)
They has a simple but promising concept. What if the monsters you were afraid of as a little kid -- the ones under your bed and in your closet -- were real? And not in a cuddly Monsters Inc. way. They are back, and this time, your mom's not around to close the closet door and turn on your night light.

They is a "grown up" horror movie. The main characters aren't in high school or college. They've got jobs or are doing post-graduate work. And They mostly manages to avoid the screamingly lame stuff normally associated with horror movies: bad acting, bad FX, transparent attempts to be hip, one or two obligatory nude scenes for the thirteen-year-old boys. Here's a horror movie that doesn't rely on a high body count or a high booty count. It doesn't feel like sleazy teensploitation or a jokey Scream rip-off. The people involved in the film -- the director, the writer, the actors -- give it the old (graduate) college try, earnest and straight-faced, and manage to make the single most bland and uninteresting horror movie in recent memory.

The acting is believable. Ethan Embry (Empire Records, Can't Hardly Wait, and the short-lived TV show Freaky Links) is the most recognizable player, and the most fun to watch. Marc Blucas plays the stalwart-but-clueless boyfriend, as dependable as a two-by-four, and just about as interesting -- a role he perfected as Riley Finn on Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

The monsters are suitably slimy and vague, like the gray and shadowed things on the cover of an H.P. Lovecraft book. There's a fair amount of cheap but effective jump-in-your-seat scares. But there's no real sense of dread or urgency to keep the movie going in between the "Boo! Gotcha." moments. One of the characteristics of They is that They can only get you in the dark. They also have the ability to short-circuit light sources, both electric and battery-powered. But it's hard to get involved in the struggle of the characters to keep from being pulled into the dark by They, because 1) Their tendency to use their short-circuiting powers follows no rhyme or reason and 2) Their sensitivity to light varies greatly. For example, in one scene, the flash of a lighter is enough to stave off one of Them, but (SPOILER IN THIS SENTENCE) in one scene They manage to snatch somebody, even though full daylight is coming in through one window.

The lack of consistency leads one to the conclusion that the survival of the characters depends not on their own actions, but on the determination of the screenwriter of what is the proper time to kill somebody off. . As such, there's a monotonous inevitability to even the "payoff" scenes.

You pretty much have to bring your own fears to the movie, because They isn't going to put any new ones in you. I mean, the creaky elevator shaft and the improbably abandoned gymnasium pool are only scary, like, the first three hundred and fifty-eight times. Been there, yawned at that. Horror-wise, the scariest thing is the vicarious ick factor of watching the main character pull a bone-like fragment of mysterious origins from a festering sore on her forehead.

After watching They, I found myself feeling strangely nostalgic about Jeepers Creepers. Sure, it was silly and stupid, but I at least walked out of the theater with the sense that I enjoyed myself.

I keep racking my brain to come up with a horror movie released in the last four years that was less interesting than They. The parts of Legion of the Dead were sewn together with all the skill of an inebriated Dr. Frankenstein. . Ghosts of Mars was unwaveringly unremarkable. Hollow Man, The Haunting, and Jurassic Park III were bloated beasts from the deepest bowels of the Hollywood dumbassery. And Soul Survivors and FearDotCom were trashtacular crapsterpieces of staggeringly epic proportions. But every one of them was more fun to watch, in its own way, than They.

They will draw some defenders from those who appreciate its attempt to tell a straight-up horror tale. They'll point to some recent cinematic travesties and say, "It's better than those movies. They isn't that bad." And they'll be right. They isn't a bad movie. A bad movie would have been more entertaining.

In case you couldn't tell, RevSF Film/DVD Editor Jason Myers wants his $9.50 back.

Recommend Us
  • Send to a Friend
  • Digg This
  • Reddit It
  • Add to del.ic.ious
  • Share at Facebook
  • Discuss!
  • Send Feedback
  • will take them into the Wild
  • can only work in her favor moving
  • Off Topic
  • Movie Forum
  • Related Pages
  • Print This Page
  • Sci-Fi Slapass Remake Newsblast: They Live, Soylent Green, Tarzan
  • RevolutionSF Newsblast: Nebula Awards, Terry Bisson
  • Avengers: United They Stand
  • Search RevSF
  • New on RevSF
  • Star Wars: The Last Jedi
  • Book Probe: BattleMaster, Wade of Aquitaine, Kriendria of Amorium
  • RevSF Podcast: Drowning in Moonlight: Remembering Carrie Fisher
  • Logan
  • RevSF Home

  • Things From Our Brains
    Get even more out of RevSF.

    The only free sci-fi and humor zine left in America.
    RevolutionSF RSS Feed
    Search RevSF

    Random RevSF
    DragonCon 2001 Gallery

    contact : advertising : submissions : legal : privacy
    RevolutionSF is ™ and © Revolution Web Development, Inc., except as noted.
    Intended for readers age 18 and above.