home : news : reviews : features : fiction : podcast : blogs : t-shirts : wtf?
 

Finn`s Wake : The Entropy of the Three Stooges
A Weekly Column of Opinion
© Mark Finn
July 26, 2003

I went on a bender the other day and watched roughly eight hours of Three Stooges shorts. It had been years since I had seen any Stooge material outside of a few brief clips, and watching them all in a prolonged stretch was an amazing thing.

I’m willing to bet that half of the women reading this just dropped out. Hey, call me a chauvinist, but if you can find a woman who will tolerate the Stooges, let alone suffer an intelligent Stooge conversation with a smile, I’ll show you a rare breed of woman indeed. I read Gregg Stevens’ explanation of this phenomenon and I can’t really find fault with it. However, I think I can supply a more post-modern interpretation of The Three Stooges that will serve to make them valid for the 21st century. No, I’m not kidding, either.

Born in the cauldron of Vaudeville road shows, the Three Stooges went from playing support for Ted Healy to developing their own act and striking out on their own. The “stooge,” in Vaudeville parlance, was an inept character that the lead comedian or straight man used to get laughs. Healy’s Stooge act quickly became the draw of his touring show in the 1920s and 1930s. Years later, when Columbia signed the Three Stooges to a series of 2-reel comedy shorts, they became the most popular comedy series for the studio for many years. Even now, one can see the Three Stooges on any number of TV stations across the country. I first watched them in the 1970s on the late, great Slam Bang Theater out of Dallas, Tx.

Let’s face it; it’s humor at its most crude. Slapstick (so named because of the noise-maker used to dress up the appropriate action with a startling noise) is that broad, hyper-violent, physical comedy that gets laughs by surprise and the display of pain. As forward-thinking denizens of the future, we should be beyond its rudimentary charms -- but we aren’t. Moe catching a wooden board in the face is just as funny now as it was 65 years ago. What keeps us coming back to The Stooges?

For me, it’s about learning that we aren’t the masters of our environment. The Three Stooges are nothing less than a force of nature, a subtle reminder that we’re not as clever as we think we are. They are pure chaos, constantly trying to impose order on their world, and incapable of recognizing that they are themselves the agents of chaos.

Their task may be simplicity itself: fix the plumbing, paint the office, press and steam the pants. Their methods are direct, often springing from the id. The quickest way to get at a pipe is to go through the wall. Why waste time painting the walls when you can paint the pictures on them as well? Moe, the Alpha male of the group, is constantly trying to bring order and control to the task at hand. “You go over there and start painting,” he says, and usually Moe is focused on the task at hand and doing a good (or at least not damaging) job. It’s when he catches a face full of paint or a saw across the top of his head that he has to stop what he’s doing and maintain order -- through violence (again, the most direct and most flawed form of control). It’s these reactions that set up reactions from both Stooge and environment, until the house floods, the walls collapse, and the police (always lampooned, even if they are the real representation of law and order) are dispatched. Stooge shorts frequently end with the Stooges making a fast getaway, the job thoroughly botched.

Only Moe understands that he is attempting to impose order and maintain the status quo. The other Stooges see this goal, and are fully aware of it, and may even think that they are achieving it, but never do. Curly, Larry, Moe, and even Shemp are defeated by their own nature every time.

Each Stooge represents an aspect of modern man, with inherent foibles and flaws that constantly impede their progress. Curly is the most savage of the trio. He barks at the things that thwart him, engages in presenting behavior when pretty women are nearby, and has the least amount of self-control in social situations. Even when he’s behaving properly in a social context, it’s with the self-satisfaction of a performing chimp who has mastered a trick. And frequently, if not rewarded, Curly’s behavior reverts to type. At his most primal, Curly’s motivation comes from having his basic needs tended to: food, shelter, clothing, companionship, etc.

Larry is the perception of the civilized man; cultured (he plays the violin), suave (often the target of the women’s affections), and constantly trying to placate either Moe or Curly with words -- violence is rare from Larry. He’s the most put-upon Stooge by default, and also the most hapless. One gets the impression that if he were more aggressive, he’d be more effective. Larry seems constantly conflicted, with one foot in the camp of violence, and one foot in the camp of reason.

Moe is the true embodiment of the civilized man. He’s the leader through intimidation, speaker for the trio, and on the surface, the most competent in his ability to interact with the rest of the world. However, he is the most violent of the Stooges, using violence as his first mode of expression, particularly in negative emotions or corrective behavior. He may act more civilized than Curly, but he’s no better. In fact, he’s worse in temperament.

Watching the Three Stooges now, it’s easy to see how they continue to mirror the very society they lampoon. As comic foils, they provide an insight into how modern man takes an overly simplistic view of complex problems, and vice versa. Doomed to failure when they feel it is impossible for them to not succeed, their only recourse is more chaos and the expression of empty violence. The Three Stooges are symbols of the entropy inherent in civilization and society, and as such they are not to be dismissed so lightly for their usage of slapstick and shtick. A cigar may be just a cigar, but a slap is never just a slap.

Mark Finn is the Games Editor for RevolutionSF and the author of two books of fiction: Gods New and Used and Year of the Hare.

 
Recommend Us
  • Send to a Friend
  • Digg This
  • Reddit It
  • Add to del.ic.ious
  • Share at Facebook
  • Discuss!
  • Send Feedback
  • All Hail Fred Stanton
  • Lost
  • Con Dorks 2
  • TV Forum
  • Related Pages
  • Print This Page
  • Star Wars Memories: The Phantom Menace
  • Star Wars Memories: My First Exposure
  • Vampire Movies: Fright Night, Cronos, Nosferatu
  • Search RevSF
  • New on RevSF
  • Book Probe: BattleMaster, Wade of Aquitaine, Kriendria of Amorium
  • RevSF Podcast: Drowning in Moonlight: Remembering Carrie Fisher
  • Logan
  • Book Probe: All Our Wrong Todays, Cubit Quest, Esper Files
  • RevSF Home

  • Things From Our Brains
    Get even more out of RevSF.


    James Bond:
    The History of the Illustrated 007
     
    RevolutionSF RSS Feed
     
    Search RevSF


    Random RevSF
    RevolutionSF Has An Opinion : McDonalds, Marvel vs. Killjoys

     
     
     
    contact : advertising : submissions : legal : privacy
    RevolutionSF is ™ and © Revolution Web Development, Inc., except as noted.
    Intended for readers age 18 and above.